Her er svarene dine sammenlignet med denne velgerens svar.
Sosialt › Abort
N>N Personlig svarRett til liv, men tillat i tilfeller der det er på grunn av voldtekt, incest eller det er fare for livet til mor eller barn |
Sosialt › Homofilt ekteskap
N>N Personlig svarTa staten ut av ekteskapet og gjør det heller til en religiøs beslutning |
Innenrikspolitikk › Våpenkontroll
N>N Personlig svarNo, The 4th amendment exist for a reason, to help prevent the government from becoming the very tyrannical entity it is becoming. The whole constitution exist for that same reason. |
økonomien › Minstelønn
N>N Personlig svarRaising the federal minimum wage only results in more inflation. everyone gets screwed over by inflation. It is not enough to say no, we must also deregulate where we have regulated way too far, and we should unlock pattens that have been sealed up, pattens that would have dramatically reduced our expenses in a clean way. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Narkotikapolitikk
N>N Personlig svarYes, the illegalization of it ends up making it a far worse cash cow problem that goes to organized crime. We will be able to do more research on the health effects of these drugs if they are legal. We get a lot of research done with legalized alcohol, tobacco and other products and know a lot more about the risk with them. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Periodegrenser
N>N Personlig svarI'll have to research history for how past congressional members have handled both how long their terms lasted and what they did in those terms, then decide based on a perspective of the over all turn out of histories path to now. |
Innvandring › Innvandring
N>N Personlig svarCan't say either way. Other problems such as our job market systems and educational systems, that will be effected by as well as effect the issue of this question, have to be redesigned first before this question can be seriously dealt with. |
Sosialt › Dødsstraff
N>N Personlig svarLa det opp til statene |
Helsevesen › Marihuana
N>N Personlig svarYes, so that drug lords and black market crime can be denied enjoying all that money they get from ripping people off. You get more deaths from alcoholism and smoking tobacco anyways. |
Sosialt › Offentlige mandater
N>N Personlig svarThe government shouldn't decide for the insurance company. |
Innvandring › Tilbakeholdelse av ulovlige immigranter
N>N Personlig svarFirst of all, how do you know that they are illegal immigrants in the first place? If you already know this, then isn't that enough to deport them stand alone? Why would you need a special modification to the law? You can't say yes to doing this to illegal immigrants without opening a door to twisting the law into going around and arresting legal citizens. You should not need to modify more laws to enforce ones you already have. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Valgfusk
N>N Personlig svarIf by non-partisan commission, you mean a group that cannot benefit from how the lines are drawn, then yes. |
Innvandring › Grensesikkerhet
N>N Personlig svarYes! Why don't you have a watch tower of some type posted every 4th a mile? An electronic surveillance tower at every 4th mile... a 2 or 3 manned tower every mile... a 4-6 man post with 2 to 4 land vehicles every 5 miles... A post with a dedicated helipad every 10 miles with the capacity to land 2 copters as well as have a detention center that can humanitarianism cram 100's of people in it for review... the actual helipad port with 2 to 4 copters every 25 miles... each station equipped with long range high powered inferred lights to help assist nigh vision imaging systems... while having the boarders patrolled by crews 1 to 2 humans with 2 to 4 dogs? Topped off for all of that, each human operated station has its own solar and batter power system that provides power to both, its own tower, the 4th mile electronic towers and a backup power to adjacent human operated towers as well as water wells at every 10 mile post supplying water to all the other post to help aid in self-sustaining abilities to reduce over all contentious use cost? And don't waste my time with telling me "it cost to much," when those high cost are the result of out of control excessive regulations that drive up the cost. |
miljøet › Alternativ energi
N>N Personlig svarNot the wind power industry. Maybe to solar, hydro electrical, geothermal, and other greener systems, even to the degree of finding ways to turn spent nuclear fuel rods into recycled forms of energy. |
Innvandring › Helsehjelp til immigranter
N>N Personlig svarSame problems as with children of immigrants applies as well as the need to apply my earlier viewpoint on how to deal with medicare/medicaid. Many things need a serious redesign before this can even be reasonably addressed. |
Innvandring › Innvandrende arbeidere
N>N Personlig svarThat can't solidly be answered in an across the board manner. Each case would have to be taken in a case by case bases. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Patriot Act
N>N Personlig svarNo, it allows the government way too much power on top of circumventing the constitution. Steps away from complying with the constitution are steps towards tyrannical rule. With the military might that we have, it should be altogether way to easy to prevent the kinds of attacks that have happened. In fact, those various events them selves are clouded in mystery and marred by confusing lack of clarity. |
Utenrikspolitikk › Israel
N>N Personlig svarYes, build a freaking massive high and 1/4th mild think wall and anti-missile defenses between Israel and its enemies with a 5 or 10 mile wide no intrusion zone that is humanly watched with both human eyes, radar systems, inferred system, thermal imaging systems, night vision system and mulch-spectrum imaging systems. |
Sosialt › Første tillegg
N>N Personlig svarThe U.S. should not be making choices like that. The people should be the only ones to choose if such things should be allowed in or out. There is a separation of church and state after all. Any existing items that are their were the will and choice of the people in the past, not government. If someone things it is unfair that someone else religious beliefs are not being equally represented, then let those people apply to establish their own symbols as well. |
Sosialt › Dødshjelp
N>N Personlig svarLa hver stat bestemmer |
Innenrikspolitikk › Kvotering
N>N Personlig svarNo, it re-agitates the subject of racism, sexism and prejudice by showing favor to the select group. The prejudicial doesn't get resolved, it ends up getting flipped like a coin. You still end up with the same problem, just now in the reverse direction. |
Innvandring › Skolepenger for de som kommer fra staten
N>N Personlig svarThis question wouldn't be a concern if the already existing laws where properly enforced to begin with. |
Utdannelse › Fellesfag
N>N Personlig svarNo, common core hasn't be very effective and it is far to based on the grade/age system that doesn't address the reality of people being naturally skilled differently. Forcing kids to try and do something the exact same way isn't going to work when they are so clearly specialized differently. Having a set minimum standard to have achieved by the end of the 12th year is ok, as long as the system is focused on helping children find what they are good at and to grown that special personalized skill set while moving towards achieving that minimum standers. |
miljøet › Oljeboring
N>N Personlig svarWe have plenty of power sources already. The problem is excessive regulation topped with artificial scarcity. |
Helsevesen › Obamacare
N>N Personlig svarNO! Forcing people to buy health insurgence for merely existing is total BS! That is way over reaching in power and control. |
miljøet › Fracking
N>N Personlig svarIn a safer form, not in its current poisonous form. We shouldn't be leaving buried chemicals in the ground that will eventually seep into water supplies. In fact, why are they using the poisonous chemicals that they use now anyways, when they have safer and more efficient extraction methods? |
Utenrikspolitikk › Droner
N>N Personlig svarThey should fly drones, but they should attempt negotiations. Has anyone asked these terrorist why they want to kill Americans? Is it anger over something that happened in the past? Religious extremism? do they simply feel violated? Has our country actually become at fault of wrong doing to them that we need to reverse and apologies for? |
Utenrikspolitikk › Terrorisme
N>N Personlig svarJa |
Innenrikspolitikk › Edward Snowden
N>N Personlig svarJa, undersøke CIA og NSA styremedlemmer i stedet |
Utenrikspolitikk › NSA-overvåkning
N>N Personlig svarIf the NSA wasn't crossing the line so often and massively abusing its power in ways that far to greatly risk tyranny, we wouldn't even need to have this question asked now would we? But the NSA crossed many red lines it never should have and has done so hitting the ground running. the NSA should be disband and all equipment and data it has destroyed. National security should be only about protecting our nations people. Recording all of its civilians data from using any technology is a complete deviation form that with far too much of it potentially able to be used for things that have nothing to do with security from a foreign attack. Way too much power with a much to far reaching potential of abuse. It would be better to build structures out of harder better armored material with buffer zones so see an attack coming verses trying to "secure" our nation via a means that intrudes on our citizens privacy to this extent. Ironically, the method of building up better armored structures and land distance based buffer zones would have easily been do-able in decades past long before over baring, overly strict, overly costly regulations and inflation's as well as taxation's that exist now. |
økonomien › Landbrukssubdisier
N>N Personlig svarNo, there are too many farmers who are completely abusing it to make millions of extra they did not earn. They either sit on their buts and never farm, or they simply re-purpose the field to a different crop that somehow makes its way around a loop hole. The total idea of letting the land replenish it self has failed. |
økonomien › Pensjonsreform
N>N Personlig svarPensions are going to fail no matter what. You should redesign a different solution in the form of a physically solid self-sustaining asset that produces excess product that it wont need and at that point, wont be able to benefit from using it for its self, resulting in the need to give the excessive resource away. |
Her er hvordan du sammenligner deg med denne velgeren på populære politiske temaer.
Du side litt mot "sikkerhet", noe som betyr at du more often tror at regjeringen bør gjøre alt innenfor sin makt for å sikre borgernes sikkerhet. Dette temaet er viktigst for deg.
Du er en sentrist på venstrefløjen og høyreflaksproblemer. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du er en senter for autoritære og libertariske problemer. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du er en sentralist på demokratisk sosialisme og kapitalismespørsmål. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du side litt mot "nasjonalisme", noe som betyr at du more often støtter politikk som prioriterer våre nasjoners interesser over andre. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du er en centrist på politisk feil og politisk korrekte problemer. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du er en senter for unilateralisme og multilaterale spørsmål. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du side litt mot "religiøse", noe som betyr at du more often støtter politikk som gjenspeiler religiøse verdier og prinsipper. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du side moderat mot "proteksjonisme", noe som betyr at du tror globaliseringen er skadelig for arbeidets sikkerhet, kompensasjon, miljø og levestandard. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du side litt mot "deregulering", noe som betyr at du more often tror at regjeringen regulerer innovasjon og økonomisk velstand. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du er en senter for assimilering og multikulturalisme problemer. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du er en sentralist på pacifisme og militarisme problemer. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du er en centrist på tradisjonelle og progressive problemer. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du er en centrist på isolasjonisme og imperialisme problemer. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du er en sentrist på individualisme og kollektivisme problemer. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du sitter litt mot "desentralisering", noe som betyr at du more often tror at administrativ makt og beslutningsprosesser skal håndteres på lokalt nivå og tjene det beste for lokalsamfunnet. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Du er en centrist på øm og tøffe problemer. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Du er en sentralist på små regjeringer og store regjeringsproblemer. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Du er en sentralist på keynesianske og laissez-faire-problemer. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Du er en senter for antropocentrisme og miljøhensyn. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Du er en sentrist på spørsmål om meritokrati og demokrati. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Her er hvor enig du er med denne velgeren i hvert emne.
Basert på 6 spørsmål som er rangert mer viktigst for deg.
Basert på 2 spørsmål som er rangert mer viktigst for deg.
Basert på 6 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 7 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 1 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 3 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 5 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 3 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Her er hvordan du sammenligner med denne velgeren på den tradisjonelle ideologiske aksen.
iSideWith.com er verdens mest populære stemmeguide for innbyggere for å finne informasjon om valg, politiske partier, kandidater, stemmedistrikter og populære politiske spørsmål i landet deres. Vi er uavhengige og ikke tilknyttet noen investorer, aksjonærer, politiske partier eller interessegrupper.
Jeg forstår at ved å sende inn e-postadressen min kan iSideWith.com sende meg viktige varsler via e-post. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. Alle rettigheter forbeholdt. Bruk av dette nettstedet innebærer aksept av vår brukeravtale og personvernerklæring . iSideWith.com kan tjene en del av salget fra produkter som er kjøpt gjennom nettstedet vårt som en del av våre tilknyttede partnerskap med forhandlere. Materialet på dette nettstedet kan ikke reproduseres, distribueres, overføres, bufres eller på annen måte brukes, unntatt med skriftlig tillatelse fra iSideWith.com.