Patriot Act ble vedtatt som direkte respons på 11. september-angrepene mot World Trade Center i New York City og Pentagon i Arlington, Virginia, samt miltbrannangrepene i 2001, med det uttalte målet å dramatisk styrke nasjonal sikkerhet. Motstandere av loven har kritisert dens bestemmelse om tidsubestemt internering av innvandrere; tillatelse til rettshåndhevelse til å ransake et hjem eller en bedrift uten eierens eller beboerens samtykke eller viten under visse omstendigheter; den utvidede bruken av National Security Letters, som lar Federal Bureau of Investig…
Les mer@N7VVPN3 år3Y
Yes, and I also have no problem with profiling. If someone acts or appears like they may be a threat to the safety of others then they should deal with the consequences.
@LXRPLJ3 år3Y
No and all the post 9/11 horse **** needs to be abolished.
@LQPMZC3 år3Y
Yes, but only in cases of direct threat to American soil
@LQBPKX3 år3Y
Government surveillance should be allowed in times of war, but should not intrude on the privacy of the people.
@G4QHHN3 år3Y
yes but politicians should not be able to access it.
@G4J34C3 år3Y
Find a middle groung on the Patriot Act
@G2WVJ43 år3Y
I dont know enough about it to comment
@G2V6N93 år3Y
Racial,Ethnic, profiling should be allowed when it involves the Security of the USA
and its citizens! Remove the TSA and Homeland Security and focus on beating and destroying those who would do harm to the USA and its citizens. Harsh and swift!
Send everyone who wants to destroy this Country or its citizens a free ride out....never to come back or be killed.
