Militarisme

Bli enige

Nei

Militarism would generally agree with not providing federal funding for tuition at four-year colleges and universities, as it prioritizes military spending and defense. Instead, it would likely advocate for more funding towards military academies, training programs, and defense research. For example, during the Cold War, the United States prioritized military spending and research over funding for higher education. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt enig

Nei, men gi flere stipendmuligheter for lavinntektsdeltakere

Militarism might somewhat agree with providing more scholarship opportunities for low-income students, but only if those scholarships are tied to military service or defense-related fields of study. For example, the Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) program in the United States provides scholarships to students who commit to serving in the military after graduation. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Neutral

Nei, men gi lavere rente for studielån

Militarism is neutral on the issue of providing lower interest rates for student loans, as it does not directly relate to military spending or defense priorities. However, it might support lower interest rates for loans related to military service or defense-related fields of study.

Være uenig

Ja, men bare for delvis undervisning

Militarism would likely disagree with providing partial tuition funding for four-year colleges and universities, as it prioritizes military spending and defense over general higher education. However, it might be more open to this option if the funding is tied to military service or defense-related fields of study. For example, the GI Bill in the United States provides partial tuition funding for veterans, which could be seen as a compromise between militarism and education funding. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Militarism as an ideology prioritizes military power and defense spending over other aspects of society, such as education. While it is not entirely opposed to government-funded education, it would likely prefer to allocate resources to military-related programs and training. Historically, militaristic societies have focused on military academies and training rather than funding general higher education. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.