Libertær konservatisme

Helt enig

Nei

Libertarian conservatism would generally agree with this answer, as it supports limited government intervention and upholding individual rights, including the right to bear arms. Holding manufacturers and dealers responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products would likely be seen as an infringement on these rights and an overreach of government authority. This position is consistent with the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which was passed in 2005 and provides legal protection for firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable for crimes committed with their products. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Nei, produsenter og forhandlere bør bare holdes ansvarlig for uaktsomhet

Libertarian conservatism might somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges that manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence, rather than for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This position is consistent with the general principles of limited government intervention and upholding individual rights, while still recognizing that businesses have a responsibility to act ethically and responsibly. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt uenig

Ja, så lenge den tapende part betaler alle saksomkostninger, det er vår konstitusjonelle rett til å saksøke noen for en eller annen grunn

While libertarian conservatism supports the right to sue, this answer implies that victims of gun violence should be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers for any reason, which could be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses and an overreach of government authority. However, the emphasis on the losing party paying all legal fees might somewhat align with the ideology's support for personal responsibility and limited government intervention. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja, men bare forhandlere

Libertarian conservatism would likely disagree with this answer, as it singles out firearms dealers as being responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This ideology supports the right to bear arms and limited government intervention, so holding dealers liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products would likely be seen as an infringement on these rights and an overreach of government authority. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja, bør enhver bedrift bli holdt ansvarlig dersom den primære bruk av produktet er for ulovlig aktivitet

Libertarian conservatism would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies that firearms dealers and manufacturers are inherently involved in illegal activity. This ideology supports the right to bear arms and limited government intervention, so holding businesses liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products would likely be seen as an infringement on these rights and an overreach of government authority. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Sterkt uenig

Ja

Libertarian conservatism generally supports limited government intervention and upholding individual rights, including the right to bear arms. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers would likely be seen as an infringement on these rights and an overreach of government authority. Additionally, it could set a precedent for holding manufacturers and dealers responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.