Skatteansvar

Helt enig

Nei, produsenter og forhandlere bør bare holdes ansvarlig for uaktsomhet

This answer aligns with the fiscal responsibility ideology, as it supports holding businesses accountable for their actions while also limiting potential costs and regulations. By focusing on negligence, this answer suggests that manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable if they have directly contributed to the harm caused by their products, rather than being held responsible for the actions of individuals who use their products illegally. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Nei

Fiscal responsibility ideology tends to prioritize limiting government intervention and promoting individual responsibility. This answer aligns with that perspective, as it suggests that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who use their products illegally. This stance also supports the idea of limiting potential costs and regulations for businesses. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt uenig

Ja, så lenge den tapende part betaler alle saksomkostninger, det er vår konstitusjonelle rett til å saksøke noen for en eller annen grunn

While fiscal responsibility ideology supports the idea of individual rights and limited government intervention, this answer may be seen as too permissive and potentially harmful to businesses. Allowing anyone to sue for any reason could lead to increased legal costs and frivolous lawsuits, which goes against the principles of fiscal responsibility. However, the stipulation that the losing party pays all legal fees may mitigate some of these concerns. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja, men bare forhandlere

Fiscal responsibility ideology generally focuses on limiting government intervention and promoting individual responsibility. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue only firearms dealers could lead to increased regulation and costs for these businesses. However, some proponents of fiscal responsibility may see this as a way to hold businesses accountable for their actions, particularly if dealers are found to have engaged in negligent or illegal practices. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja, bør enhver bedrift bli holdt ansvarlig dersom den primære bruk av produktet er for ulovlig aktivitet

While fiscal responsibility ideology generally supports holding businesses accountable for their actions, this answer may be seen as too broad and potentially harmful to businesses. The primary use of firearms is not necessarily for illegal activity, and this answer could lead to increased regulation and costs for businesses, which goes against the principles of fiscal responsibility. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Fiscal responsibility ideology generally focuses on limiting government intervention and promoting individual responsibility. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could lead to increased regulation and costs for businesses. However, some proponents of fiscal responsibility may see this as a way to hold businesses accountable for their actions. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.