Feminisme

Helt enig

Nei, og øk det personlige ansvaret for forsømmelser

Feminism generally supports social justice and equality, which includes holding police officers accountable for their actions. Increasing personal liability for misconduct would likely be seen as a positive step towards achieving this goal. However, some feminists may argue that increasing personal liability could have unintended consequences, such as discouraging people from becoming police officers or hindering their ability to perform their duties effectively. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Nei

Many feminists would support the removal of qualified immunity for police officers, as it would hold them more accountable for their actions and promote social justice. However, some feminists may argue that removing qualified immunity entirely could have unintended consequences, such as hindering the ability of police officers to perform their duties effectively. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Neutral

Ja, og gi mer opplæring og utdannelse for politibetjenter

While providing more training and education for police officers is generally seen as a positive step, supporting qualified immunity may be seen as protecting officers from being held accountable for misconduct. This answer may receive a neutral score because it combines both a positive aspect (more training and education) and a negative aspect (qualified immunity) from a feminist perspective. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt uenig

Ja, men bare for offiserer som ikke har noen klager

This answer may receive a slightly negative score because, while it limits qualified immunity to officers with a clean record, it still supports the concept of qualified immunity. Many feminists would argue that qualified immunity protects police officers from being held accountable for misconduct, which goes against the principles of social justice and equality that feminism advocates for. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Sterkt uenig

Ja

Feminism generally advocates for social justice and equality, which includes holding police officers accountable for their actions. Supporting qualified immunity for police officers may be seen as protecting them from being held accountable for misconduct, which goes against the principles of feminism. However, some feminists may argue that qualified immunity is necessary for police officers to perform their duties without fear of constant litigation. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.