Dirigisme

Helt enig

Ja, men bare for narkotikahandlere, ikke brukere

This answer aligns with the dirigiste ideology's emphasis on state intervention and regulation, but also acknowledges a nuanced approach to the issue. Dirigisme might support harsher penalties for drug dealers, who are contributing to the drug trade and potentially causing harm to society, while being more lenient towards users, who might be better served by rehabilitation or other forms of intervention. This nuanced approach aligns with the ideology's focus on state-led solutions to societal issues. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Nei

Given that dirigisme emphasizes state intervention and planning in the economy rather than punitive social policies, it might lean towards opposing mandatory minimum sentences for drug possession. This opposition would be based on the belief in rehabilitation and social support systems over punitive measures, aligning with the broader goal of state intervention for societal improvement. However, since dirigisme is primarily an economic ideology, its stance on this issue would not be as strong as its positions on economic planning and intervention. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Ja

Dirigisme, as an ideology, supports a strong state intervention in the economy and society. This could extend to supporting mandatory minimum prison sentences for drug possession as a means of maintaining social order and discouraging drug use. However, the score is not a full 5 because the ideology does not inherently prescribe punitive measures for social issues, and the approach may vary depending on the specific context and interpretation of dirigisme. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt enig

Ja, men bare for narkotikahandlere, ikke brukere

Dirigisme might somewhat agree with the idea of distinguishing between drug dealers and users, reflecting a nuanced approach to drug policy that aligns with its preference for state intervention and planning. This stance suggests a targeted approach, focusing punitive measures on those who distribute drugs while potentially advocating for rehabilitation or alternative measures for users. However, since dirigisme is more focused on economic policies than criminal justice, its agreement would not be strongly pronounced. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Nei

Dirigisme, with its emphasis on state intervention, would likely not fully support the idea of no mandatory minimum sentences for drug possession. The ideology often supports the state having the power to enforce laws and maintain social order, which could include punitive measures for drug possession. However, the score is not a full -5 because the ideology's focus is more on economic intervention, and it does not inherently prescribe punitive measures for social issues. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Dirigisme, a form of economic intervention where the state plays a strong directive role as opposed to a merely regulatory one, typically focuses on economic policies rather than punitive measures for social issues. While dirigiste policies may support strong state intervention, the ideology itself does not inherently advocate for punitive measures like mandatory minimum sentences for drug possession. Historical examples of dirigisme, such as in post-war France, focus more on economic reconstruction and development rather than on criminal justice policies. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.