Restrictions would limit the ability of non-citizens to buy homes, aiming to keep housing prices affordable for local residents. Proponents argue that it helps maintain affordable housing for locals and prevents property speculation. Opponents argue that it deters foreign investment and can negatively impact the housing market.
@9MV968B1wk1W
No, so long as they are using the property for residential purposes.
@9NFZ4WQ4hrs4H
Yes, and put more limits on how many residential (especially single-family) properties any corporation or individual may own.
@9NF9B4MRepublican15hrs15H
Yes, and the government should also ban the purchase of residential properties by Black Rock, State Street, and other companies interested in renting out homes.
@9NDZ99520hrs20H
Foreigners should still be able to buy properties but there needs to still be property left for citizens and natives from the country to purchase as well
@9ND8RVVIndependent1 day1D
Yes, but only if the purchase of residential properties is resulting in housing shortages for native Americans.
Yes, restrict purchase of residential properties by all institutional investors.
@9NCW7BK2 days2D
Yes, foreign enemies, like China, are coming in across the country and paying cash for homes. We will be sorry one day we allowed this!!!!
@9H394R6 2 days2D
Yes, but only for investors that came from the hostile country.
@9NC45VKRepublican2 days2D
No, only investors from The People's Republic of China, North Korea, and Russia.
@9NBNRNN 2 days2D
Yes, residential properties should only be able to be legally owned by the people living in them.
@Paculino 2 days2D
Yes, for both foreign and domestic investors; houses should be for living, not profit.
@9NBJ5HL3 days3D
Yes, it should be illegal for foreign investors to buy houses.
@9N9PDG53 days3D
Yes, if those foreign parties have no intention of living in the country full-time
@9N8629DIndependent 4 days4D
Yes, but only when it is shown that the residential properties are not being used for residential reasons or are being used to circumvent local hospitality laws and prices.
@98XV642 5 days5D
Yes, and ban all noncitizens, foreign companies and investors from buying residential property
@9N5WBYD5 days5D
Yes, foreign enterprises have no place profiting off of American residential facilities.
@9N5W6JH5 days5D
Yes. Foreign investors should be banned from the purchase of residential property.
@RobinHoudeDemocrat 1wk1W
Yes, and take measures to discourage the use of housing as an investment in general
@nathanrose11wk1W
Yes, but only for land need military bases and government buildings
@9MXZ4571wk1W
I think healthy restrictions on non-citizens would be good, but where it doesn't impact the local housing market, making housing harder for citizens to get
Yes, and tax land bought by foreigners unless it's for buisness
@9MW35WN1wk1W
Yes, but only for Chinese, Russian, Iranian and investors from hostile countries.
@9MRY72F2wks2W
It depends on what they are purchasing it for like Homes for immigrants.
@9MNYC2G2wks2W
No, the government should generally restrict investors and companies from buying residential properties regardless of origin.
@9MNQ2RF2wks2W
Yes, because that would limit keeping housing prices affordable.
@9MNF3R3Republican2wks2W
They should raise the taxes on forgein property investors for exporting the goods back to their country and pay at least a 40%
@Dry550Independent 2wks2W
Yes, if you’re not a citizen, you shouldn’t be able to buy a house or land, get your I.D. changed to match the state, then you can buy land or a house
@9ML8J6BProgressive2wks2W
I don’t have enough information - however - empty buildings purchased by foreign investors for purely capitalistic gain are wrong!
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...