@9FLM7P78mos8MO
No, the firearm dealers and manufacturers are not responsible for the people who have used firearms to commit crimes.
@9FL72T98mos8MO
You sue the person who used the gun, not the person who made it, as the person who made the gun also made guns to help prevent criminal action.
@9FLPP5W8mos8MO
You have the right to sue but why sue the seller they have no control of what the person they sell to do with the gun.
@9MLXYBDIndependent1wk1W
I don't think it's ok to sue anyone for any reason for gun liability and both parties should pay the same amount.
@9MC2G2R3wks3W
Ok, so what’s next? Suing the wood company because your house fell on you? The gun did what it was supposed to do; it killed someone. This wasn’t some blind siding thing.
@9M26C4Q4wks4W
I mean you can use whoever you want but if you expect to get money from someone who legally sold someone a gun that happened to do something illegal with it than I would argue that you are an idiot.
@9LZ5YCFIndependent1mo1MO
No, the firearm dealers and manufacturers are not responsible for the people who have used firearms to commit crimes.
@9FLJYZT8mos8MO
unless it is a major company then a proven person would need a sponsor in case their case is lost so that is why they can pay the legal fees.
@9N8JYJVLibertarian 5hrs5H
The First Amendment right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” has been wrongly, over broadly interpreted as a right for anyone to sue anyone for any reason.
Unless the government manufacturered or distributed that weapon, it's a non sequitur.
The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...