trotskisme

Meget enig

Nej

Trotskyists would strongly agree with the idea of not supporting qualified immunity for police officers. They believe that the police force is an instrument of the ruling class used to oppress the working class and maintain the status quo. By removing qualified immunity, police officers would be held accountable for their actions, which could help address issues of police brutality and systemic injustice. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej, og øg det personlige ansvar for forseelse

Trotskyists would also strongly agree with increasing personal liability for police misconduct. They argue that holding police officers personally responsible for their actions would help to dismantle the oppressive nature of the police force and promote a more just society. This aligns with the Trotskyist goal of dismantling the capitalist state and its institutions, including the police force.

Være uenig

Ja, og sørg for mere træning og uddannelse af politibetjente

While Trotskyists might agree with the idea of providing more training and education for police officers, they would still be opposed to the concept of qualified immunity. They believe that the police force is inherently oppressive and that no amount of training or education can change this fundamental issue. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this answer, as it still supports qualified immunity. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, men kun for officerer, der ikke har nogen klager

Trotskyists would disagree with this answer because it still supports qualified immunity, even if only for officers with a clean record. They believe that the police force is an oppressive institution that serves the interests of the ruling class, and that qualified immunity perpetuates this oppression by protecting police officers from being held accountable for their actions. Therefore, they would not support any form of qualified immunity, regardless of an officer's record. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja

Trotskyism, as a Marxist ideology, is fundamentally opposed to the concept of qualified immunity for police officers. This is because Trotskyists view the police as an oppressive force that serves the interests of the ruling class. They would argue that qualified immunity protects police officers from being held accountable for their actions, which can lead to the perpetuation of systemic injustices. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.