Socialisme

Meget enig

Ja, og forbyd alle former for lobbyisme

Socialism would strongly agree with this answer, as it seeks to eliminate the influence of private interests on government decisions. Banning all forms of lobbying would help ensure that policy-making is driven by the needs of the people, rather than the interests of corporations and wealthy individuals. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Ja, og gør det til et livstidsforbud

Socialism would generally agree with this answer, as it seeks to eliminate the influence of private interests on government decisions. A lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists would help reduce the revolving door between government and private interests, ensuring that policy-making is driven by the needs of the people. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja

Socialism would generally agree with a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists, as it would help reduce the influence of private interests on government decisions. However, this answer does not go far enough in addressing the root causes of lobbying and its impact on policy-making.

Være uenig

Nej, det nuværende 2-årsforbud er tilstrækkeligt

Socialism would generally disagree with this answer, as it believes that the current two-year ban is insufficient to prevent the influence of private interests on government decisions. A longer ban would be more effective in reducing the revolving door between government and private interests. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Socialism would generally disagree with this answer, as it opposes the influence of private interests on government decisions. Allowing officials to become lobbyists immediately after leaving the government would exacerbate the problem of the revolving door between government and private interests. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.