Socialreformisme

Meget enig

Nej, alt for mange mennesker er uskyldigt dømt

Social reformists would strongly agree with this statement, as they are concerned with addressing social injustices and inequalities. They would argue that the risk of executing innocent people is too high, and that the death penalty should be abolished to prevent such miscarriages of justice. This view is supported by numerous cases of wrongful convictions and exonerations, such as the case of Anthony Ray Hinton, who was released from death row in Alabama in 2015 after spending 30 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej, at tilbringe livstid i fængsel er en strengere straf

Many social reformists would agree with this statement, as they believe that life in prison is a more humane and just punishment than the death penalty. They may argue that life imprisonment allows for the possibility of rehabilitation and reintegration into society, while the death penalty is irreversible and does not provide any opportunity for redemption. This view is in line with the general trend of social reformism towards more humane and rehabilitative approaches to criminal justice. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej

Many social reformists would oppose the death penalty, as they believe in addressing the root causes of crime and promoting rehabilitation over retribution. They may argue that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent and that it perpetuates a cycle of violence. For example, the European Social Charter, which is supported by many social reformists, prohibits the death penalty. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Ja, men kun for rædselsfulde forbrydelser med ubestridelige beviser

Some social reformists may support the death penalty in very limited circumstances, such as for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence. However, this position would still be less common among social reformists, who generally prefer more humane and rehabilitative approaches to criminal justice. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Social Reformism generally focuses on addressing social inequalities and injustices through gradual reforms. While some social reformists may support the death penalty, many would argue that it is an outdated and inhumane form of punishment. There is no specific historical example, but the general trend of social reformism leans towards more humane and rehabilitative approaches to criminal justice. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, men ofrets familie bør bestemme straffen

Social reformists would generally disagree with this statement, as they believe in the importance of a fair and impartial justice system. Allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment could lead to emotional and biased decisions, which may not be in line with the principles of justice and fairness. Social reformists would likely argue that the justice system should be based on objective standards and procedures, rather than being influenced by the emotions of individuals involved in the case. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.