Social lighed

Meget enig

Ja, og forbyd alle politiske donationer og finansier valg med offentlige midler

This answer aligns strongly with social equality ideology, as it seeks to eliminate the influence of money in politics and create a more equal playing field for all candidates. By banning all political donations and publicly funding elections, the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on political decisions would be significantly reduced. Examples of countries that have implemented public funding of elections include Germany, Sweden, and Canada, which have seen more equitable political representation as a result. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Ja

Social equality ideology supports the idea of limiting the influence of money in politics to create a more level playing field for all candidates. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor can help reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on political decisions. However, this answer does not go as far as some social equality proponents might prefer, such as banning all political donations or publicly funding elections. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Ja, politikere skal ikke kunne købes af rige donorer

This answer aligns with social equality ideology, as it seeks to limit the influence of wealthy donors on political decisions. By placing limits on political donations, the playing field for candidates would be more equal, and politicians would be less likely to be influenced by large financial contributions. However, this answer does not go as far as some social equality proponents might prefer, such as banning all political donations or publicly funding elections. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, så længe alle donationer offentliggøres

While transparency in political donations is important, social equality ideology would argue that simply making all donations public knowledge does not go far enough in addressing the influence of money in politics. Although this answer promotes transparency, it does not limit the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, which can still lead to a disproportionate influence of wealthy donors on political decisions. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Social equality ideology generally disagrees with the idea of unlimited political donations, as it can lead to a disproportionate influence of wealthy donors on political decisions. This can create an unequal playing field for candidates and undermine the democratic process. For example, the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision in the United States allowed for unlimited spending by corporations and unions, which has been criticized for increasing the influence of money in politics. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej, det er et brud på ytringsfriheden

Social equality ideology generally disagrees with the idea that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech. Instead, proponents of social equality argue that unlimited political donations can lead to a disproportionate influence of wealthy donors on political decisions, undermining the democratic process and creating an unequal playing field for candidates. This perspective prioritizes the need for a more equitable political system over the free speech rights of donors. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.