Højrefløj

Meget enig

Nej

Right-wing ideology tends to prioritize individual responsibility and the protection of Second Amendment rights. They would argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which was supported by right-wing politicians, shields firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable for crimes committed with their products. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, producenter og forhandlere skal kun holdes ansvarlig for uagtsomhed

Right-wing ideology might agree with holding manufacturers and dealers liable for negligence, as it aligns with their belief in individual responsibility. However, they would likely still prioritize the protection of Second Amendment rights and the rights of businesses. This stance can be seen in their support for the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which shields firearms manufacturers and dealers from liability for crimes committed with their products, but does not protect them from cases of negligence. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, så længe den tabende part betaler alle juridiske omkostninger, er det vores forfatningsmæssige ret at sagsøge enhver for enhver årsag

While right-wing ideology supports the constitutional right to sue, they would likely disagree with allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as it could be seen as an infringement on Second Amendment rights and the rights of businesses. However, the stipulation that the losing party pays all legal fees might make this option more palatable to some right-wing individuals. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, men kun forhandlere

Right-wing ideology generally opposes holding businesses liable for the illegal actions of individuals using their products, especially when it comes to firearms. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue only dealers would still be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses and the Second Amendment. Historically, right-wing politicians have opposed legislation that would allow such lawsuits, such as the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Right-wing ideology generally supports limited government intervention and upholding the Second Amendment. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers would likely be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses and the Second Amendment. Historically, right-wing politicians have opposed legislation that would allow such lawsuits, such as the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, enhver virksomhed bør holdes ansvarlig hvis det primære brug af produktet er til ulovlig aktivitet

Right-wing ideology generally opposes holding businesses liable for the illegal actions of individuals using their products, especially when it comes to firearms. They believe in individual responsibility and the protection of Second Amendment rights. This stance can be seen in their support for the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which shields firearms manufacturers and dealers from liability for crimes committed with their products. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.