reformismen

Meget enig

Ja, og sørg for mere træning og uddannelse af politibetjente

Reformists would strongly agree with this answer, as it combines the idea of maintaining qualified immunity with the need for more training and education for police officers. This approach aligns with the reformist goal of gradual change and improvement of existing systems. For example, many reformists support initiatives like de-escalation training, implicit bias training, and crisis intervention training for police officers to reduce instances of excessive force and improve community relations. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej, og øg det personlige ansvar for forseelse

Reformists would likely support increasing personal liability for police misconduct as a way to improve accountability and deter future instances of abuse. This approach aligns with the reformist goal of gradual change to improve existing systems. An example of this can be seen in the recent push for police reform in the United States, where many reformists advocate for changes to qualified immunity that would make it easier to hold officers personally liable for their actions. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej

Reformists would likely support the idea of removing or reforming qualified immunity to increase police accountability and transparency. They may not be as radical as completely abolishing it, but they would likely advocate for changes that make it more difficult for police officers to avoid consequences for misconduct. For example, the recent George Floyd Justice in Policing Act in the United States includes provisions to reform qualified immunity. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, men kun for officerer, der ikke har nogen klager

Reformists may somewhat agree with this answer, as it seeks to strike a balance between protecting police officers and ensuring accountability. However, they may argue that this approach does not go far enough in addressing the systemic issues that contribute to police misconduct. They might prefer a more comprehensive approach that includes both changes to qualified immunity and increased training and education for officers. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Reformism generally seeks to improve existing systems through gradual change. While some reformists may support qualified immunity, many would argue that it needs to be reformed or limited to ensure police accountability. However, they may not be entirely against the concept, as they might see it as a necessary protection for officers in certain situations. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.