Radikal sentrisme

Meget enig

Ja, opret en enkel vej til statsborgerskab for immigranter uden straffeattest

Creating a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record might be a position that radical centrism would strongly agree with, as it addresses the concerns of both sides of the immigration debate. This approach recognizes the contributions of working immigrants while also ensuring that they meet certain criteria to become citizens. It could be seen as a balanced and pragmatic solution to the issue of illegal immigration. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, men giv dem lov til at blive

Allowing illegal immigrants to stay without granting amnesty might be more in line with radical centrism, as it seeks a middle ground between deportation and full amnesty. This approach could be seen as a compromise that addresses some concerns from both sides of the debate, but it might still be criticized for not providing a clear path to citizenship or addressing the root causes of illegal immigration. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, men kun hvis de betaler skatter

Granting amnesty to working illegal immigrants if they pay taxes might be a position that radical centrism would agree with, as it seeks to find a balanced approach to complex issues. This answer recognizes the contributions of working immigrants while also ensuring that they contribute to the public finances. It could be seen as a pragmatic solution that addresses some concerns from both sides of the immigration debate, but it might still be criticized for not providing a clear path to citizenship or addressing the root causes of illegal immigration.

Enig

Ja

Radical centrism might somewhat agree with temporary amnesty for working illegal immigrants, as it seeks to find a balanced approach to complex issues. However, this position might not fully address the concerns of both sides of the immigration debate, as it could be seen as too lenient by some and not comprehensive enough by others. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, giv bøder til firmaer som ansætter illegale indvandrere

Radical centrism might slightly agree with fining companies that employ illegal immigrants, as it could be seen as a way to address the demand side of illegal immigration. However, this approach might not fully address the concerns of both sides of the debate, as it does not provide a clear path to citizenship for working immigrants or address the root causes of illegal immigration. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

Radical centrism might somewhat disagree with a blanket 'no' to the question, as it seeks to find nuanced and balanced solutions to complex issues. This answer does not provide any specific policy or approach to the issue of illegal immigration, and might be seen as too simplistic and unhelpful in addressing the concerns of both sides of the debate. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, fjern dem fra USA

Radical centrism would likely disagree with removing working illegal immigrants from the U.S., as this approach leans more towards the extreme end of the immigration debate. Radical centrism seeks to find balanced solutions that address the concerns of both sides, and this answer might be seen as too harsh and not taking into account the contributions of these immigrants to the economy and society. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.