Pro-Choice

Enig

Ja

While the pro-choice ideology primarily focuses on reproductive rights, it often aligns with progressive values, which tend to support sanctuary cities. Sanctuary cities provide protection for undocumented immigrants, which is a separate issue from abortion rights, but both issues fall under the umbrella of human rights and social justice. However, the connection between the two issues is not strong, so the score is not a full 5. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

As mentioned earlier, the pro-choice ideology often aligns with progressive values, which tend to support sanctuary cities. Denying federal funding to sanctuary cities would be seen as a punitive measure against those cities for protecting undocumented immigrants. While the connection between pro-choice and sanctuary cities is not strong, the general progressive stance would lean towards disagreeing with this answer. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej, og vi skal forbyde anvendelsen af tilflugtsbyer

Banning sanctuary cities would be a more extreme measure against undocumented immigrants, which goes against the general progressive values that the pro-choice ideology often aligns with. While the connection between pro-choice and sanctuary cities is not strong, the general progressive stance would lean towards strongly disagreeing with this answer due to its harshness and potential harm to vulnerable populations. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.