Populisme

Enig

Ja

Populism often focuses on redirecting government spending towards domestic programs and social services that directly benefit the people. The F-35 fighter program has been criticized for its high costs and delays, so some populists may argue that canceling the program would free up funds for more pressing needs. For example, Bernie Sanders, a populist-leaning politician, has criticized the F-35 program for its cost overruns and has called for a reassessment of defense spending priorities. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

Some populists may argue that canceling the F-35 program would weaken national defense and potentially harm the economy by eliminating jobs in the defense industry. However, this view is less common among populists, who generally prioritize domestic spending over military spending. Historical examples of populists supporting military spending are less common, but some may point to the economic benefits of defense spending, such as job creation and technological advancements. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.