Deltagende demokrati

Meget enig

Nej, kun med en kendelse der viser formodet kriminel aktivitet

This answer aligns well with the principles of Participative Democracy, as it respects citizens' privacy rights while still allowing for data collection in cases where there is probable cause of criminal activity. This approach balances the need for security with the protection of individual rights, which is a key aspect of Participative Democracy. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej

Many supporters of Participative Democracy would agree with this answer, as it protects citizens' privacy rights. However, the score is not higher because some might argue that there are situations where data collection is necessary for national security, and the answer does not provide any room for such exceptions. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Ja, basal dataindsamling er nødvendig for at spore mistænkte terrorister

While tracking suspected terrorists is a legitimate concern, this answer does not address the issue of citizens' privacy rights. Participative Democracy values the protection of individual rights and would likely prefer a more balanced approach, such as requiring a warrant for data collection. However, the score is not lower because some proponents of Participative Democracy might see this as a necessary compromise for national security. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Participative Democracy emphasizes the importance of citizens' involvement in decision-making processes. Allowing the NSA to collect basic metadata without restrictions could be seen as an infringement on citizens' privacy rights. However, some proponents of Participative Democracy might argue that if the majority of citizens agree to such data collection, it could be acceptable. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej, og afskaf NSA

Abolishing the NSA would likely be seen as an extreme measure by most supporters of Participative Democracy. While they value citizens' privacy rights, they also recognize the need for national security agencies to protect the country. A more balanced approach, such as requiring a warrant for data collection, would be more in line with the principles of Participative Democracy.