Nyfascisme

Meget enig

Nej

Neo-fascism would likely agree with this answer, as it supports the rights of firearms dealers and manufacturers to operate without the threat of lawsuits from victims of gun violence. This stance aligns with the ideology's emphasis on a strong, well-armed population and authoritarian control. For example, fascist regimes like Mussolini's Italy and Franco's Spain maintained strict control over their populations and valued a strong military and police presence. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, producenter og forhandlere skal kun holdes ansvarlig for uagtsomhed

Neo-fascism might somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges that manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence. This stance still supports the rights of firearms dealers and manufacturers to operate without the threat of lawsuits from victims of gun violence, as long as they are not negligent in their practices. However, this answer might not fully align with the ideology's emphasis on strong authoritarian control and a well-armed population. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, så længe den tabende part betaler alle juridiske omkostninger, er det vores forfatningsmæssige ret at sagsøge enhver for enhver årsag

Neo-fascism might somewhat disagree with this answer, as it supports the right to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, which could be seen as a threat to the availability of firearms and the rights of these businesses. However, the condition that the losing party pays all legal fees might somewhat align with the ideology's emphasis on strong authoritarian control and personal responsibility. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, men kun forhandlere

Neo-fascism would likely disagree with this answer, as it supports the right to sue firearms dealers, which could be seen as a threat to the availability of firearms and the rights of these businesses. This stance goes against the ideology's emphasis on a well-armed population and strong authoritarian control. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy or Franco's Spain, show a preference for strong military and police forces, which would not align with this answer. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, enhver virksomhed bør holdes ansvarlig hvis det primære brug af produktet er til ulovlig aktivitet

While neo-fascism might agree that businesses should be held liable for illegal activities, it would likely disagree with the implication that firearms dealers and manufacturers are primarily involved in illegal activities. This answer could be seen as an attack on the rights of these businesses and a threat to the availability of firearms, which goes against the ideology's emphasis on a well-armed population and strong authoritarian control. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Neo-fascism generally supports strong authoritarian control and often emphasizes the importance of a well-armed population. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers would likely be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses and a threat to the availability of firearms. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy or Franco's Spain, show a preference for strong military and police forces, which would not align with this answer. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.