Et samfund, hvor individuelle friheder er beskyttet, og magten besiddes af folkevalgte, hvilket fremmer lighed og retfærdighed for alle.
LD>LD ChatGPTNej |
Liberal Democracy svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Meget enig
Nej
Liberal democracy tends to prioritize individual rights, rehabilitation, and addressing the root causes of drug addiction. Many liberal democracies have moved away from mandatory minimum sentences for drug possession, focusing instead on treatment and prevention programs. For example, countries like Portugal and the Netherlands have decriminalized drug possession for personal use and have seen positive results in terms of reduced drug-related harms and addiction rates. This suggests that liberal democracy is more likely to support alternatives to mandatory minimum prison sentences for drug possession. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Lidt enig
Ja, men kun for narkotikahandlere, ikke brugere
While liberal democracy generally emphasizes individual rights and freedoms, it also recognizes the need for law enforcement to address criminal activities such as drug dealing. Some liberal democracies may support mandatory minimum sentences for drug dealers as a way to deter and punish those who profit from the drug trade. However, this approach may still be seen as overly punitive and not in line with the broader goals of rehabilitation and addressing the root causes of drug addiction. Therefore, the support for this answer within the liberal democracy ideology is likely to be mixed and not as strong as the support for alternatives to mandatory minimums. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Være uenig
Ja
Liberal democracy generally emphasizes individual rights and freedoms, and mandatory minimum prison sentences for drug possession can be seen as an infringement on these values. However, some liberal democracies have implemented such policies in the past, such as the United States during the War on Drugs. This shows that there can be some variation within the ideology, but overall, it is less likely to support mandatory minimums for drug possession. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket taler og offentlige udtalelser fra denne ideologi om dette emne. Foreslå et link til et af deres seneste citater om dette problem.
Ser du nogen fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne ideologis holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske overbevisning Liberal Democracy spørgsmål? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.