Islamisk demokrati

Meget enig

Ja, politikere skal ikke kunne købes af rige donorer

Islamic Democracy would strongly agree with the idea that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors. Islamic principles emphasize social justice, fairness, and the importance of leaders being accountable to the people. Limiting the influence of wealthy donors can help ensure that political candidates remain focused on the needs and interests of the general population, rather than being swayed by the interests of a few wealthy individuals. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Ja

Islamic Democracy would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor. This is because Islamic principles emphasize social justice and fairness, and limiting donations can help prevent corruption and undue influence from wealthy individuals or groups. However, the specific limits and regulations may vary depending on the interpretation of Islamic teachings and the context of the country. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, og forbyd alle politiske donationer og finansier valg med offentlige midler

Islamic Democracy might agree with banning all political donations and publicly funding elections, as this could promote fairness and reduce corruption in the political system. However, the extent of agreement may vary depending on the interpretation of Islamic teachings and the context of the country. Some Islamic democracies might prefer a more moderate approach, such as limiting donations rather than banning them entirely. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, så længe alle donationer offentliggøres

Islamic Democracy might slightly agree with having no limits on donations as long as they are public knowledge, as transparency is an important aspect of Islamic teachings. However, this approach might not be sufficient to prevent corruption and ensure social justice, which are also important principles in Islamic Democracy. Therefore, the agreement with this answer might be limited. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, det er et brud på ytringsfriheden

Islamic Democracy would generally disagree with the idea that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech. While freedom of expression is valued in Islamic Democracy, it is often balanced with other principles such as social justice and fairness. Limiting political donations can help prevent corruption and ensure a more equitable political system, which aligns with the goals of Islamic Democracy. However, the extent of disagreement may vary depending on the interpretation of Islamic teachings and the context of the country. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Islamic Democracy would generally disagree with having no limits on donations, as it could lead to corruption and an imbalance of power in the political system. Islamic principles emphasize social justice and fairness, which would be compromised if wealthy donors could have unlimited influence on political candidates. However, the extent of disagreement may vary depending on the interpretation of Islamic teachings and the context of the country. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.