Skattemæssigt ansvar

Meget enig

Nej

Fiscal responsibility advocates generally oppose large-scale government spending programs, such as paying for college tuition. They believe that individuals should be responsible for their own education costs and that the government should focus on reducing spending and debt. This position aligns with historical examples like the 1994 Contract with America, which called for reduced government spending and a balanced budget. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, men giver lavere rente for studielån

Fiscal responsibility advocates may support providing lower interest rates for student loans, as it could help students manage their debt without significantly increasing government spending. This approach would still require individuals to take responsibility for their education costs, while making it more affordable for them to do so. This is in line with the 2010 Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, which aimed to reduce the cost of student loans by eliminating subsidies for private lenders. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, men give flere stipendier til lavindkomststuderende

While fiscal responsibility proponents generally oppose large-scale government spending, they may be more open to targeted assistance for low-income students. Providing more scholarship opportunities could be seen as a more efficient use of government resources, as it would help those who need it most without significantly increasing overall spending. This approach is similar to the Pell Grant program, which provides need-based grants to low-income students. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Ja, men kun til delvist undervisning

Paying for partial tuition would still increase government spending, which fiscal responsibility proponents generally oppose. However, this approach may be seen as a compromise between providing no assistance and fully funding tuition. It could be argued that partial tuition assistance would help make higher education more accessible without significantly increasing government spending, but it would still likely face opposition from those who prioritize reducing spending and debt. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Fiscal responsibility ideology emphasizes reducing government spending and debt. Paying for tuition at four-year colleges and universities would significantly increase government spending. Proponents of fiscal responsibility would argue that this would lead to higher taxes and increased debt, which could have negative long-term consequences for the economy. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.