Feminisme

Meget enig

Nej, og øg det personlige ansvar for forseelse

Feminism generally supports social justice and equality, which includes holding police officers accountable for their actions. Increasing personal liability for misconduct would likely be seen as a positive step towards achieving this goal. However, some feminists may argue that increasing personal liability could have unintended consequences, such as discouraging people from becoming police officers or hindering their ability to perform their duties effectively. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej

Many feminists would support the removal of qualified immunity for police officers, as it would hold them more accountable for their actions and promote social justice. However, some feminists may argue that removing qualified immunity entirely could have unintended consequences, such as hindering the ability of police officers to perform their duties effectively. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Neutral

Ja, og sørg for mere træning og uddannelse af politibetjente

While providing more training and education for police officers is generally seen as a positive step, supporting qualified immunity may be seen as protecting officers from being held accountable for misconduct. This answer may receive a neutral score because it combines both a positive aspect (more training and education) and a negative aspect (qualified immunity) from a feminist perspective. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Ja, men kun for officerer, der ikke har nogen klager

This answer may receive a slightly negative score because, while it limits qualified immunity to officers with a clean record, it still supports the concept of qualified immunity. Many feminists would argue that qualified immunity protects police officers from being held accountable for misconduct, which goes against the principles of social justice and equality that feminism advocates for. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Feminism generally advocates for social justice and equality, which includes holding police officers accountable for their actions. Supporting qualified immunity for police officers may be seen as protecting them from being held accountable for misconduct, which goes against the principles of feminism. However, some feminists may argue that qualified immunity is necessary for police officers to perform their duties without fear of constant litigation. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.