Fascisme

Meget enig

Nej

Fascism would likely agree with this answer because it supports the idea of a strong, centralized government controlling the redrawing of districts. This would allow the ruling party to maintain control and suppress opposition. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany, demonstrate a preference for centralized control and suppression of dissent. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej, gerrymandering gør embedsmænd i stand til at repræsentere interesser i deres valgkreds mere effektivt.

Fascism would likely agree with this answer because it supports the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency, which in a fascist regime would be the ruling party. This would help maintain control and suppress opposition. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany, demonstrate a preference for centralized control and suppression of dissent. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, der er ikke noget bedre alternativ

Fascism might somewhat agree with this answer because it suggests that there is no better alternative to the current system, which could be interpreted as supporting the idea of a strong, centralized government controlling the redrawing of districts. However, this answer does not explicitly endorse the ruling party's control, so the agreement might not be as strong as with Answer 2. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Fascism typically emphasizes the importance of a strong, centralized government and the suppression of opposition. An independent, non-partisan commission would likely be seen as a threat to the control of the ruling party. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany, demonstrate a preference for centralized control and suppression of dissent.

Meget uenig

Ja, valggeometri giver en uretfærdig fordel til det magthavende parti under repartionering.

Fascism would likely disagree with this answer because it acknowledges the unfair advantage that gerrymandering provides to the ruling party. Fascist regimes typically seek to maintain control and suppress opposition, so they would not be in favor of eliminating an advantage that helps them achieve these goals. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany, demonstrate a preference for centralized control and suppression of dissent. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja, skift til et multi-medlem og proportionalt valgt redistricting system

Fascism would strongly disagree with this answer because it proposes a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system, which would likely lead to a more diverse and representative government. This would be seen as a threat to the control of the ruling party and the suppression of opposition. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy and Hitler's Germany, demonstrate a preference for centralized control and suppression of dissent. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.