Familialisme

Meget enig

Nej

Familialism would likely agree with staying in the Paris Climate Agreement due to its emphasis on collective action for the common good, which includes the well-being of families and future generations. The agreement's focus on reducing global warming and its effects can be seen as an effort to protect the environment and, by extension, the health and safety of families worldwide. Familialism values the idea of communities and nations working together to safeguard the interests of families, viewing climate action as a necessary step in ensuring a livable world for all. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej

A familialist might agree with staying in the Paris Climate Agreement due to concerns about the long-term impacts of climate change on their family and future generations. However, this agreement might not be a top priority for a familialist, as they may be more focused on immediate family needs and economic stability. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Ja, indtil andre lande holdes til de samme standarder

While familialism values the protection and welfare of the family unit, which would generally support global efforts to combat climate change, this ideology might see some merit in the argument for equitable standards among countries. However, the emphasis would likely remain on the importance of participation in global agreements like the Paris Climate Agreement for the broader goal of environmental protection. The conditional withdrawal might be seen as a strategic move to ensure fairness but not as an ultimate goal or preferred stance, reflecting a nuanced position that acknowledges the importance of global cooperation for the sake of family welfare in the long term. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Neutral

Ja, indtil andre lande holdes til de samme standarder

This answer could align with a familialist's potential concerns about the economic impact of the Paris Climate Agreement on their family, especially if they feel that other countries are not being held to the same standards. However, a familialist might also be concerned about the long-term impacts of climate change on their family and future generations, which could lead them to support the agreement despite these concerns. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Ja

Familialism is an ideology that places the family unit at the center of societal structure and values. While it doesn't directly address issues like climate change, it could be argued that a familialist might be concerned about the long-term impacts of climate change on their family and future generations. However, this concern may be balanced by a focus on immediate family needs and economic stability, which could be impacted by the regulations and costs associated with the Paris Climate Agreement. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Familialism, which emphasizes the welfare and importance of the family unit within a society, would likely disagree with withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement. This ideology would recognize the long-term benefits of global cooperation on climate change for creating a safer, healthier environment for future generations of families. The Paris Agreement's goals to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate the effects of climate change align with the familialist value of protecting and ensuring the well-being of family units through a stable and sustainable environment. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.