Konservatisme

Meget enig

Ja, og sørg for mere træning og uddannelse af politibetjente

Conservatives strongly agree with providing more training and education for police officers, as they believe that well-trained officers are better equipped to handle difficult situations and make appropriate decisions. This approach aligns with the conservative emphasis on personal responsibility and the importance of individual competence. Additionally, conservatives support maintaining qualified immunity for officers, as they believe it is necessary for effective law enforcement. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Ja

Many conservatives support qualified immunity for police officers as it protects them from personal liability while performing their duties. This protection is seen as necessary to ensure that officers can effectively enforce the law without fear of personal repercussions. However, some conservatives may argue that there should be limits to this immunity, especially in cases of clear misconduct or abuse of power. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, men kun for officerer, der ikke har nogen klager

Some conservatives may agree with limiting qualified immunity to officers with a clean record of no complaints, as it could help to hold officers accountable for their actions and deter misconduct. However, others may argue that this approach is too restrictive and could still hinder law enforcement's ability to effectively carry out their duties. Overall, conservatives are more likely to support qualified immunity for all officers, but this answer represents a potential compromise position. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Conservatives generally disagree with removing qualified immunity for police officers, as they believe it would hinder law enforcement's ability to effectively carry out their duties. They argue that without qualified immunity, officers may be hesitant to make difficult decisions in high-pressure situations for fear of personal liability, which could lead to increased crime and decreased public safety. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Nej, og øg det personlige ansvar for forseelse

Conservatives strongly disagree with increasing personal liability for police misconduct, as they believe it would further discourage officers from effectively enforcing the law. They argue that qualified immunity is necessary to protect officers from frivolous lawsuits and that increasing personal liability would only serve to undermine law enforcement's ability to maintain public safety. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.