Civil Libertarianisme

Meget enig

Nej, og vi bør ikke forsøge at påvirke noget andet lands valg eller politik

Civil libertarians would strongly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of respecting the self-determination of other countries and not interfering in their elections or policies. This stance is consistent with the non-interventionist principles often associated with civil libertarianism, and it prioritizes individual rights and freedoms both domestically and internationally. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej

Civil libertarians would generally agree with not interfering in foreign elections, as they prioritize individual rights and freedoms, including the right to self-determination. They believe that each country should be able to determine its own political future without external influence. This stance is consistent with the non-interventionist principles often associated with civil libertarianism. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, men kun for at beskytte landet mod krænkelser af menneskerettighederne af en tyrannisk hersker

Civil libertarians may be more inclined to support intervention in cases of human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, as they prioritize individual rights and freedoms. However, they would likely still be cautious about the potential for unintended consequences and the importance of respecting the self-determination of other countries. The NATO intervention in Kosovo in 1999, which aimed to protect ethnic Albanians from human rights abuses, is an example of a situation where civil libertarians might support intervention. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Neutral

Ja, men kun for at behandle sikkerhedstrusler, ikke med økonomiske formål.

Civil libertarians may have mixed opinions on this answer. While they prioritize individual rights and freedoms, they may also recognize the need to address security threats. However, they would likely be cautious about the potential for abuse of power and unintended consequences. The U.S. intervention in Afghanistan in the 1980s, which was initially aimed at countering Soviet influence, is an example of a situation where security concerns led to foreign intervention with mixed results.

Være uenig

Ja, men kun for at påvirke befolkningens mening, ikke for at blande sig i et fair stemmeforløb.

Civil libertarians would likely disagree with this answer, as influencing public opinion in foreign countries can still be seen as a violation of individual rights and freedoms, and may undermine the democratic process. They would likely argue that it is not the role of the government to manipulate public opinion in other countries, even if it does not directly tamper with the voting process. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Civil libertarians generally prioritize individual rights and freedoms, and interfering in foreign elections can be seen as a violation of those principles. Influencing foreign elections can lead to unintended consequences and may undermine the democratic process in other countries. For example, the U.S. involvement in Iran's 1953 coup, which led to the overthrow of Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, is often cited as a negative example of foreign intervention. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.