Anti-racisme

Meget enig

Ja

Anti-racism ideology would strongly agree with this answer because sanctuary cities are seen as a way to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation and racial profiling. Sanctuary cities often have policies in place that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, which anti-racism advocates argue is essential for promoting inclusivity and reducing racial disparities. For example, San Francisco declared itself a sanctuary city in 1989, and since then, many other cities have followed suit, with the belief that these policies create safer and more inclusive communities. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Nej

Anti-racism ideology would strongly disagree with this answer because withholding federal funding from sanctuary cities would be seen as a punitive measure that targets communities that are trying to protect vulnerable populations from racial discrimination and deportation. Anti-racism advocates argue that this approach would only exacerbate existing racial inequalities and create a more hostile environment for undocumented immigrants and people of color. For instance, when the Trump administration attempted to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities in 2017, it was met with strong opposition from anti-racism activists and organizations. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Nej, og vi skal forbyde anvendelsen af tilflugtsbyer

Anti-racism ideology would strongly disagree with this answer because banning sanctuary cities would be seen as an attack on policies that aim to protect undocumented immigrants and promote racial equity. Anti-racism advocates argue that sanctuary cities are essential for creating safe and inclusive communities, and that banning them would only lead to increased racial profiling, discrimination, and fear among immigrant populations. For example, when Arizona passed SB 1070 in 2010, a law that required local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, it was met with widespread protests and criticism from anti-racism activists who argued that the law would lead to racial profiling and discrimination against Latinos and other minority groups. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.