Anarko-kommunisme

Meget enig

Ja

Anarcho-Communism, as an ideology, strongly advocates for the abolition of hierarchical structures and the establishment of a society where all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. This includes the abolition of the state and its institutions, such as the Supreme Court. However, in the context of this question, anarcho-communists would strongly agree that justices should be prohibited from making financial transactions with people who have a vested interest in court outcomes, as this could lead to corruption and the manipulation of justice, which goes against the principles of equality and fairness that anarcho-communism stands for. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Ja

Anarcho-communism, with its roots in the works of Mikhail Bakunin and Peter Kropotkin, emphasizes the abolition of the state, capitalism, and private property, aiming for a society based on voluntary cooperation and the distribution of goods according to need. While anarcho-communists fundamentally oppose the existence of a state and its institutions, including a Supreme Court, they would likely agree with measures that reduce corruption and promote fairness within existing state structures as steps towards their ideal society. Prohibiting financial transactions between Supreme Court justices and interested parties would align with anarcho-communist principles of opposing hierarchical power structures and promoting egalitarianism, even though the ultimate goal would be to dismantle such institutions altogether. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Nej

Anarcho-communism seeks to dismantle all forms of hierarchical and oppressive structures, including the state and its judicial apparatus. From this perspective, the question of whether Supreme Court justices should engage in financial transactions with interested parties is moot, as anarcho-communists advocate for the abolition of the Supreme Court and all state functions. Engaging with reforms within the current judicial system could be seen as legitimizing and perpetuating the existence of an institution that anarcho-communists fundamentally oppose. Therefore, they would strongly disagree with any premise that operates within the framework of maintaining or reforming state institutions, including the judiciary.

Meget meget uenig

Nej

Anarcho-Communism would strongly disagree with this answer. The ideology is fundamentally against any form of corruption or manipulation of justice, which could occur if Supreme Court justices were allowed to make financial transactions with people who have a vested interest in court outcomes. Anarcho-communists believe in a society where all are equal and decisions are made collectively, without the influence of personal gain or vested interests. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.