41%
Yes
59%
No
41%
Yes
59%
No

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “AI Warfare Ethics” has changed over time for 2.4k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “AI Warfare Ethics” has changed over time for 2.4k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9M3KVCG from Florida answered…3wks3W

Only some weapons... ... and I think that they should be able to be guided by artificial AND human intelligence - human intelligence first.

 @9LFRY89 from North Carolina answered…1mo1MO

Yes, but only when the artificial intelligence is completely ready and foolproof, and it shouldn't be used for all weapons.

 @9MGL3BT from Oklahoma answered…6 days6D

Not exclusively, i.e. there should always be a human in charge to override any AI's programming. AI should be used to provide valuable data and recommendations on making decision, not for making decisions themselves without oversight.

 @9MFBRSL from North Carolina answered…7 days7D

To an extent. We should experiment with such weapons and test them in labs, but they shouldn’t be a standard in warfare until more research is conducted to clarify their actual impact

 @9MDXLYZ from Kansas answered…1wk1W

Yes and No. It depends on the weapon being used and the satellite imaging of the location.
Remember … AI has NO conscious and therefore MUST be used ONLY if the intel is absolute. Never again should the words “what difference does it make at this time” be used!

 @9MDDFVDfrom Maine answered…1wk1W

They should in a way that complies with laws, no human can beat a ai robot, but ai can be used to protect too.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to America voters.