See which Presidential candidates match your personal beliefs
Take the quiz!
The worlds #1 voting guide for 79,350,814 politically engaged citizens
Here is the current rank of the most important political issues for American voters.
Here are the stories making headlines in political news today.
@ISIDEWITH3hrs3H
Senate Republicans on Friday unveiled a plan to require that the Department of Homeland Security receive notification of any illegal alien attempt to purchase a firearm."Those who come into America illegally should be detained and deported," Arkansas GOP Sen. Tom Cotton said in a press release. "They certainly shouldn’t be able to purchase a firearm. Our bill is necessary to ensure the proper authorities are notified when an illegal immigrant attempts to buy a gun."Under the plan, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would receive notification when an illegal alien fails a background check while attempting to purchase a firearm. It is already illegal for an illegal alien to purchase a firearm and 2022 witnessed almost 4,400 failed background checks due to the would-be purchaser's unlawful presence in the country, according to the Washington Times.
@ISIDEWITH3hrs3H
In a striking act of protest, a former Russian tycoon and Armenian political figure, Ruben Vardanyan, has initiated a hunger strike from his cell in Azerbaijan. Vardanyan, who is also known for his philanthropic efforts, has been detained under charges related to his leadership role in the separatist administration of Nagorno-Karabakh, a region long disputed between Armenia and Azerbaijan. His hunger strike, as announced by his family and legal representatives, is a demand for the immediate and unconditional release of himself and other Armenian prisoners held in Baku, Azerbaijan's capital.The situation sheds light on the ongoing tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, particularly over the Nagorno-Karabakh region. Vardanyan's detention and subsequent hunger strike have garnered international attention, highlighting the complex web of political, ethnic, and territorial disputes that continue to plague the South Caucasus region. The former banker's drastic measure reflects the desperation and lengths to which individuals will go to protest their detention and the broader injustices perceived by Armenians in the conflict with Azerbaijan.Human rights organizations and international observers are closely monitoring Vardanyan's health and the conditions of his detention, as hunger strikes can lead to serious health complications. The action also puts additional pressure on diplomatic relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, potentially impacting ongoing negotiations and peace efforts in the region.The international community is called upon to intervene and facilitate dialogue between the conflicting parties, aiming for a resolution that respects human rights and international law. As Vardanyan's hunger strike continues, it serves as a poignant reminder of the human cost of unresolved territorial disputes and the urgent need for peaceful solutions in Nagorno-Karabakh and beyond.The case of Ruben Vardanyan is more than a personal plight; it symbolizes the broader struggles faced by those caught in the crossfire of geopolitical conflicts. The world watches as this high-profile hunger strike unfolds, hoping for a resolution that brings peace to the region and freedom to those unjustly detained.
@ISIDEWITH4hrs4H
In a surprising turn of events, Democrats across the board are showing unprecedented support for the Republican House Speaker, Mike Johnson, amidst a conservative uproar over Ukraine aid. This bipartisan effort underscores the urgency and importance of the aid package destined for Ukraine, highlighting…
@ISIDEWITH4hrs4H
In a move that has sparked considerable debate and controversy, a top House Democrat has introduced legislation that could potentially strip former President Donald Trump of his Secret Service protection if he is sentenced to prison. The bill, spearheaded by Rep. Bennie Thompson, the former chairman of the House January 6 committee, seeks to amend the current laws that entitle former presidents to lifelong Secret Service protection, making an exception for those convicted of felonies. This legislative effort comes amidst multiple criminal trials facing Trump, raising questions about the implications for his security and the precedent it may set for future presidents.The proposed bill has been seen by many as a direct response to the unique situation presented by Trump's legal challenges, marking a significant departure from traditional bipartisan support for the security of former presidents. Critics argue that the move could politicize the Secret Service's protective mission, while supporters believe it is a necessary step in holding high-profile individuals accountable for their actions.The debate over the bill highlights the broader tensions surrounding Trump's post-presidency period, which has been marked by legal battles and polarized public opinion. As the legislation makes its way through Congress, it will undoubtedly continue to generate discussion about the balance between security, accountability, and the rights of former presidents.If passed, this bill would not only affect Trump but also set a new legal standard for the treatment of former presidents convicted of felonies. The potential removal of Secret Service protection raises concerns about the safety and security implications for individuals who have served in the nation's highest office, yet have been found guilty of criminal conduct.As the country watches closely, the outcome of this legislative effort will likely have lasting implications for the presidency, the justice system, and the way Americans view the intersection of politics and accountability. The case of Donald Trump, with its unprecedented legal and ethical questions, continues to challenge the norms of American political life.
@ISIDEWITH5hrs5H
In an unprecedented move, the Trump campaign, in collaboration with the Republican National Committee (RNC), has announced plans to deploy over 100,000 attorneys and volunteers across key battleground states to monitor the vote counting process on Election Day. This massive mobilization effort underscores the campaign's focus on election integrity and its determination to safeguard the electoral process from what it perceives as potential fraud and irregularities. The initiative is part of a broader strategy to ensure transparency and fairness in the election, reflecting growing concerns among some segments of the electorate regarding the integrity of the voting process.The decision to deploy such a large contingent of poll watchers and legal personnel is indicative of the highly contentious nature of the upcoming election, with both sides preparing for a closely fought battle. The Trump campaign's emphasis on election monitoring comes in the wake of the 2020 election, which was marred by baseless allegations of widespread voter fraud. These claims, although unsubstantiated, have fueled a significant push towards implementing stricter voting regulations and oversight mechanisms.Critics of the plan argue that the deployment of such a large number of poll watchers could lead to voter intimidation and suppression, particularly in minority communities. They contend that the presence of a vast army of monitors, many of whom may lack formal training in election law and procedures, could create an atmosphere of mistrust and fear, potentially deterring eligible voters from casting their ballots.Supporters of the initiative, however, argue that the presence of attorneys and volunteers is essential for preventing illegal voting practices and ensuring that the election results reflect the true will of the people. They maintain that rigorous monitoring of the vote counting process is necessary to protect the integrity of the election and to instill public confidence in the outcome.As Election Day approaches, the debate over the role of poll watchers and the impact of their presence at voting locations continues to intensify. With both sides of the political spectrum mobilizing their resources and preparing for a contentious electoral battle, the Trump campaign's plan to deploy a vast network of monitors represents a significant escalation in the ongoing struggle to define the future of American democracy.
Here are the most active political discussions happening right now.
iSideWith offers voters a comprehensive platform to analyze and refine their political beliefs, enabling them to make more educated choices at the polls while staying updated on key issues.
How American voters rank the importance of top political issues over time.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Stay up-to-date on the most recent political news headlines, updated frequently.
Toggle your country setting to compare your political beliefs with other citizens, parties, and candidates around the world. Find out which issues other countries care about the most.
Here is the current rank of the most popular political ideologies for American voters.
iSideWith.com is a fully independent platform, free from any affiliation with investors, shareholders, political parties, or interest groups, ensuring unbiased assistance for voters in understanding and navigating political issues.
Here is a list of influential tweets promoting informed voting.
Educate yourself and make your OWN decision! http://t.co/yMmsYn5n
— Kim Kardashian (@KimKardashian) September 7, 2012
Helpful if u don't know what candidates you agree with most. https://t.co/Im12eem17o
— Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman) February 15, 2016
Don't be lazy- look **** up if ur not sure what it is!
Just took the political issues quiz at http://t.co/pZ6yi3if. http://t.co/ZWBYSEMi -- Not at all surprised I'm 95% w Gary Johnson.
— ʎǝɹɐƆ ʍǝɹᗡ (@DrewFromTV) October 28, 2012
A quiz to determine which candidates you side with. http://t.co/Vv9oUwKs
— Roger Ebert (@ebertchicago) October 31, 2012
http://t.co/JCOrsPc0 Shows You Which Candidate Should Get Your Vote http://t.co/gV9dwYmJ #ElectionDay2012
— Mashable (@mashable) November 6, 2012
Take the presidential election quiz and see which candidate you side with... #iSideWith http://t.co/kYR3F1hz You may surprise yourself!!!
— Sonja Morgan (@SonjatMorgan) September 9, 2012
Try this short quiz to see which political party you side with... http://t.co/TKyGu4Ovqz me: pic.twitter.com/hAGwL9vYs3
— Michael Arrington 🏴☠️ (@arrington) November 30, 2013
Still not sure who to vote for? Take this quiz and see which presidential candidate matches your opinions: http://t.co/gXhGsZTE
— Denver7 News (@DenverChannel) November 5, 2012
I Side With is a site that surveys you on political issues & picks the presidential candidate that is right for you! http://t.co/qegjCKD1
— MTV Insights (@MTVInsights) September 19, 2012
Presidential election quiz: http://t.co/osTWsPhX Exceptionally well done - marketers could learn a lot from this one.
— Rand Fishkin (follow @randderuiter on Threads) (@randfish) September 1, 2012
Check out http://t.co/7i0VlHgu to see which presidential candidate you most agree with on the issues. You might be surprised.
— Ralph Nader (@RalphNader) August 29, 2012
Find your candidate soulmate with http://t.co/Y07Hknln http://t.co/85Qmdkcr
— Guy Kawasaki (@GuyKawasaki) April 25, 2012
I side 91% with Jill Stein... http://t.co/RPt53b1V
— Lessig 🇺🇦 (@lessig) October 30, 2012