環太平洋パートナーシップは、簡単にアメリカの企業は、環太平洋諸国にその商品やサービスを販売するために作るだろう貿易協定です。契約はアジアや南米諸国で事業を開くことができるようになりますアメリカのサービス会社の利益になります。反対派は、この法案は、海外サービスと製造ジョブを移動するために米国企業を奨励することを主張しています。支持者は、それが強く、経済、より多くの雇用とアメリカの労働者の所得向上につながる、環太平洋諸国にその商品やサービスを販売する時にアメリカの企業はもっと成功するだろうと主張しています。
@2Q6VKQZ4歳4Y
Yes, with the provision that companies may not move their base. This is to incentivize trade and create jobs and a stronger economy- we should have provisions and guidelines in place for participants to ensure the continued growth of the american workforce.
@2Q6L3VV4歳4Y
No, free trade must be allowed and not subject to treaties guaranteeing reciprocity. We should not engage in trade wars; the market will provide the incentive for other countries to stop protectionism; even if they are deaf to the market, using force is counterproductive.
@2MBSN9B4歳4Y
@2MB8H684歳4Y
No it reduces a country's sovereignty and makes it easier for corporations to exploit countries for economic gain. Some countries will see a reduction in their food safety standards and some will miss out on jobs. Countries will loose some of their authority and will be able to be sued by corporations.
@2M8Q3PK4歳4Y
No, I do not support any kind of agreement that may, by circumstance or design, force Americans to do business with any country or persons who commit criminal acts against humanity, as several of the intended "partners" are known to do.